2025, vol. 13, no. 2. Samigulov G.Kh.

2025, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 392-399

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2025-13-2.392-399

EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SDYTTP

   THE MEANING OF THE CONCEPT “TATARS” IN THE MOSCOW
KINGDOM DOCUMENTS ON THE TRANS-URALS
DURING THE LATE 16th – 18th CENTURIES

G.Kh. Samigulov
South Ural State University (National Research University)
Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
gayas_@mail.ru

Abstract. We habitually perceive the designations “Tatars”, “Bashkirs”, “Voguls”, etc. used in Russian documents of the late 16th – 18th centuries as ethnonyms. Usually, recon­struction of the establishment of certain linguistic/”ethnic” groups is based on the use of these notions in the sources. However, the case with the name “Tatars” is more complicated, as this word often acted as a unifying designation for different groups of communities with similar languages or a similar type of economy. However, this publication focuses on another, somewhat unexpected aspect. The analysis of sources relating to the local population of the Trans-Ural uezds during the late 16th – early 17th centuries showed that, at the early stage of the incorporation of these territories into the Moscow kingdom, the word “Tatars” often did not carry any specific linguistic or cultural load at all. It was used, along with the terms “Voguls” and “Ostyaks”, to denominate any yasak population of the forest and forest-steppe Trans-Ural uezds. Moreover, these three concepts were interchangeable – the same population groups could, in documents, be called Tatars, Voguls, or Ostyaks. At the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries there was a distribution of designations of the yasak and servant population by districts. The autochthonous population of the Tara, Tobolsk, Turinsk and Tyumen uezds began to be unambiguously called “Tatars”. This situation undoubtedly influenced the formation of the Siberian-Tatar identity since the use of the name “Tatars” in relation to the local population for three centuries could not pass without a trace.But there was another aspect; the concept of “Tatars” in the documents concerning the Trans-Urals in the 17th century was also used as a general designation of Turkic-speaking or “steppe” peoples. Tatars could also be referred to as Tartars of the Tumen, Tobolsk, etc. districts, and Bashkirs, natives of the Volga region, Kalmyks, and Kazakhs. Consequently, the name “Tatar” in the sources of the late 16th – 17th centuries appears either as a situational designation for the yasak and servant class of certain uezds, or as a generalised concept that includes groups different in identity (Bashkirs and Kazakhs) or language (Kazakhs and Kalmyks). Thus, it is necessary to rely on the use of the word “Tatars” in this group of sources to reconstruct the history of the current Tatar population in the Trans-Urals and Western Siberia only with great caution.

Keywords: Siberia, uezd, yasak people, servants, estates, nominations, 16th century, identity, Turks, borders

For citation: Samigulov G.Kh. The meaning of the concept “Tatars” in the Moscow Kingdom documents on the Trans-Urals during the late 16th – 18th centuries. Zoloto­ordynskoe obozrenie = Golden Horde Review. 2025, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 392–399. https://doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2025-13-2.392-399 (In Russian)

Financial Support: The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 24-18-20055, https://rscf.ru/project/24-18-20055/

REFERENCES

  1. Bartold V.V. Tatars. Essays: Works on the history and philology of Turkic and Mongolian peoples. Vol. 5, Moscow: Nauka, 1968, pp. 559–561 (In Russian)
  2. Vas’kov D.A. “Itinerant” Kalmyks and Kalmyks-Kourchaks in the structure of the yasak population of Tara uezd at the turn of the 17th–18th centuries. Servants and yasak people in Russia 15th–19th centuries: features of land ownership, class nominations: a collection of articles. Iss. 2, Chelyabinsk: Yuzhnyiy Ural, 2024. 170 p. (In Russian)
  3. Kazakh-Russian relations in the 16th–18th centuries. Collection of documents and materials. Alma-Ata: Kazakh ASSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1961. 741 p. (In Russian)
  4. Maslyuzhenko D.N., Ryabinina E.A. The campaign of 1483 and its place in the history of Russian-Siberian relations. Bulletin of Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethno­graphy. 2014, no. 1 (24), pp. 115–123 (In Russian)
  5. Miller G.F. History of Siberia, vol. I, 3rd edition. Edited by Batyanova E.P., Vainstein S.I. et al. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura, 2005. 630 p. (In Russian)
  6. Miller G.F. History of Siberia, vol. 2. 2nd edition, supplemented. Edited by Batyanova E.P., Vainshtein S.I. et al. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura, 2000. 796 p. (In Russian)
  7. Mustakimov I.A. Sketch of the history of the ethnonym “Tatar” in the Volga-Ural region [electronic resource]. URL: https://xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/ru/content/ocherk-istorii-etnonima-tatar-v-volgo-uralskom-regione-0 (date accessed 06.04.2025). (In Russian)
  8. Nanzatov B.Z., Tishin V.V. On the history of the Tatars in Inner Asia: the expe­rience of identification of tribal names. Zolotoordynskoe obozrenie=Golden Horde Review. 2021, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 8–27. https://doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2021-9-1.8-27 (In Rus­sian)
  9. Shishonko V. Perm’ annals from 1263 to 1881. The third period from 1645–1676. Perm’: printing house of the Provincial Zemstvo, 1884. 1168 p. (In Russian)

INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Gayaz Kh. Samigulov – Cand. Sci. (History), Senior Research Fellow of the Eurasian Studies Research and Education Centre, South Ural State University (National Research University) (76, Lenin Avenue, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russian Federation); ORCID: 0000-0002-4695-5633, ResearcherID: T-6331-2017. E-mail: gayas_@mail.ru

Received  08.04.2025
Revised  16.05.2025
 Accepted  04.06.2025