2025, vol. 13, no. 3. Moiseev M.V.

2025, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 488-498

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2025-13-3.488-498

EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AVVEZL

   ON THE TERM «TATAR» / «TATARS» IN RUSSIAN SOURCES
OF THE 15th–16th CENTURIES

M.V. Moiseev
Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, Russian Federation
maksi-moisee@yandex.ru

Abstract. Research objectives: To study the use of the word “Tatar”/“Tatars” in Russian written sources of the 15th and 16th centuries.
Research materials: This work is based on an analysis of embassy books, chronicles, church writings, and notes recorded by foreigners. The work also uses the observations of A.O. Amelkin and V.N. Rudakov on the strategies employed in describing the Mongol-Tatars by Russian scribes.
Results and scientific novelty: The study revealed several chronological layers in the use of the term “Tatars”. Its very appearance was caused by understanding the tragedy of the invasion of an unknown people and the defeat of the Russian principalities. These events were interpreted in an eschatological way, and the peoples themselves, who came with Batu and were called “Tatars”, were perceived as punishment for the local people’s sins. Then the eschatological tension surrounding the term “Tatars” gradually decreased, and after the adoption of Islam by the Horde, its population began to be defined as “Besermen” and “Hagarites”. The latter term had a pronounced negative connotation. The term “Tatars” acquired a more neutral meaning and continued to be used in clerical practice. After gaining full state sovereignty, Russia’s intellectuals and employees of the Grand Ducal chancellery began to use it more as a term to describe peoples who spoke closely related Turkic languages. As a result, the term “Tatars” became a way of classifying with a generalization. It is noteworthy that the Nogai initially somewhat discouraged the Moscow chancellery in its usage. They did not immediately find a place in this classification. This was probably caused by the fact that they were a new player on the political map of the world at that time. Later, having identified the features that brought “Nogai” closer to “Tatars,” the officials began to extend the term “Tatars” to the “Nogai”.

Keywords: Tatars, Nogai, Besermen, Agarians, Golden Horde, Kazan Khanate, Crimean Khanate, Nogai Horde

For citation: Moiseev M.V. On the term “Tatar”/”Tatars” in Russian sources of the 15th–16th centuries. Zolotoordynskoe obozrenie=Golden Horde Review. 2025, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 488–498. https://doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2025-13-3.488-498 (In Russian)

REFERENCES

  1. Amelkin A.O. The Tatar question in the public consciousness of Russia in the late 15th – first half of the 16th centuries. (based on the materials of the monuments of hagiography and folklore). Voronezh: Nauchnaya kniga, 2008. 250 p. (In Russian)
  2. Belyakov А. Serving Tatars in the Diplomatic Service of the Muscovite State: The Baymakov-Rezanov Family. Quaestio Rossica. 2021, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 886–901. (In Rus­sian)
  3. Veselovsky S.B. Feudal land ownership in Northeastern Russia. 1. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1947. 496 p. (In Russian)
  4. Veselovsky S.B. Moscow region in ancient times. In: Veselovsky S.B. The Moscow state of the 15th – 17th centuries. From the scientific heritage. Moscow: AIRO – XXI, 2008, pp. 11–73. (In Russian)
  5. Herberstein C. Notes on Muscovy. In 2 volumes. Edited by A.L. Khoroshkevich. Moscow: Monuments of Historical Thought, 2018. Vol. 1. Latin and German texts, Russian translations from Latin by A.I. Malein and A.V. Nazarenko, from Early New High German by A.V. Nazarenko. 776 p. (In Russian)
  6. Herberstein C. Notes on Muscovy. In 2 volumes. Edited by A. L. Khoroshkevich. Moscow: Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2008. Vol. 2. Articles, commentary, appendices, indexes, maps. 656 p. (In Russian)
  7. Gorsky A.A. The Moscow “ordyncy” and “delui”. In: Polychrome Vertograd: collection for the 80th anniversary of Boris Nikolaevich Flori. Moscow: Indrik, 2018, pp. 173–178. (In Russian)
  8. Zaitsev I.V. The Grand-Princely Tatars in the 15th – first half of the 16th century. and their land ownership in the Moscow region. Historical and genealogical research. In: Serving and yasak-paying people in Russia of the 15th–19th centuries: features of land ownership, class nominations. Iss. 1. Chelyabinsk, 2022, pp. 36–72. (In Russian)
  9. The history of Moscow from ancient times to the present day. In 3 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo ob”edineniia Mosgorarhiv, 1997. 432 p. (In Russian)
  10. Moiseev M.V. The Kadyshev family of messengers: milestones of official biography. Studia historica Europae Orientalis= Studies on the history of Eastern Europe. Minsk: RIHE. 2020, Iss. 13, pp. 89–96. (In Russian)
  11. The Complete collection of Russian chronicles. Vol. 1. Lavrentievskaya and Troitskaya chronicles. St. Petersburg: Tipografiia Eduarda Pratsa, 1846. 267 p. (In Russian)
  12. The Complete collection of Russian chronicles. Vol. 12. The chronicle collection, called the Patriarchal or Nikon Chronicle (Continued). Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kultury, 2000. 272 p. (In Russian)
  13. The Complete collection of Russian chronicles. Vol. 13. The chronicle collection, called the Patriarchal or Nikon chronicle (Continued). Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kultury, 2000. 544 p. (In Russian)
  14. The complete collection of Russian chronicles. Vol. 24. Typographic chronicle. St. Petersburg: 2-ia Gosudarstvennaia tipografiia. 1921. 272 p. (In Russian)
  15. The Complete collection of Russian chronicles. Vol. 30. Vladimir Chronicler. Novgorodskaya 2 (Archivskaya chronicle). Moscow: Nauka, 1965. 239 p. (In Russian)
  16. Embassy books on Russia’s relations with the Nogai Horde. 1489–1549. B.A. Keldasov, N.M. Rogozhin, E.E. Lykova, M.P. Lukichev. Makhachkala: Dagestanskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1995. 356 p. (In Russian)
  17. Embassy books on Russia’s relations with the Nogai Horde. 1551-1561. Comp. by D. A. Mustafina, V. V. Trepavlov. Kazan: Tatarskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 2006. 391 p. (In Rus­sian)
  18. The Embassy book on Russia’s relations with the Nogai Horde (1576). Preparation for publication, introduction and comments by V.V. Trepavlov. Moscow: Institute of Russian History, 2003. 93 p. (In Russian)
  19. Priselkov M.D. Troitskaya chronicle. Reconstruction of the text. Moscow-Lenin­grad: USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1950. 515 p. (In Russian)
  20. Rudakov V.N. The Mongol-Tatars through the eyes of Ancient Russian scribes in the middle of the 13th – 15th centuries. Moscow: Kvadriha, 2009. 248 p. (In Russian)
  21. Russian feudal archive of the 14th – first third of the 16th century. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskikh kultur, 2008. 552 p. (In Russian)
  22. Collections of the Imperial Russian Historical Society. Vol. 41. St. Petersburg, 1884. 642 p. (In Russian)
  23. Sergeevich V.I. Antiquities of Russian law. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, 1909. 688 p. (In Russian)
  24. Sreznevsky I.I. Materials for the dictionary of the Old Russian language on written monuments. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Izdanie Otdeleniia russkogo iazyka i slovesnosti Imperatorskoi akademii nauk, 1890–1912, 1893. (In Russian)
  25. Syroechkovsky V.E. Surozh Guests. Moscow-Leningrad: OGIZ, 1935. 126 p. (In Russian)
  26. Tikhomirov M.N. The “besermen” in Russian sources. In: Tikhomirov M.N. The Russian State 15th–17th centuries. Moscow: Nauka, 1973, pp. 84–90. (In Russian)
  27. Trepavlov V.V. Translations of ethnonyms in Russian communicative practice. In: Trepavlov V.V. Unpublished works. Moscow: Medina, 2024, pp. 638–641. (In Russian)
  28. Cherepnin L.V. Formation of the Russian centralized state in the 14th–15th centuries. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 1960. 899 p. (In Russian)  

INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Maksim V. Moiseev – Cand. Sci. (History), Senior Researcher, Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences (19, Dm. Ulyanov Str., Moscow 117292, Russian Federation); ORCID: 0000-0003-0421-8982, ResearcherID: E-1622-2016. E-mail: maksi-moisee@yandex.ru

 Received  01.04.25
Revised  25.05.25
Accepted  26.06.25