2022, vol. 10, no. 1. Akchurina-Muftieva N.M.

2022, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 229-240

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2022-10-1.229-240

   ANTHROPOMORPHISM AND ZOOMORPHISM
IN THE ORNAMENTAL ART OF THE CRIMEAN TATARS

N.M. Akchurina-Muftieva
Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University named after Fevzi Yakubov
Simferopol, Russian Federation
akchurina_05@mail.ru 

Abstract: The author of the article reveals the problem of anthropomorphic and zoomorphic images in Islamic art, particularly in the Turkic ornamentation of the Crimea. Superficial, unscientific interpretations of motifs and ornamental compositions often lead to the search for and appropriation of anthropomorphism without appropriate research, loose interpretations of motifs, and the creation of a new mythology. Despite conservative views regarding the categorical denial of the permissiveness of the image of a person, there are many surviving works of fine and decorative art that confirm an opposite tradition. Currently, there are practically no studies of anthropomorphism and zoomorphism in the Turkic ornamentation of the Crimea, their typological and artistic features, and their symbolic context.
Based on the material of decorative and applied art of the Crimean Tatars from the fourteenth century to the present, examples of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic ornamental images are provided in the article. They are stylized objects – fully, partially, or in the form of a silhouette – reflecting the surrounding real world of living beings. Complete naturalistic images (birds, fish, animals, insects) are found on objects until the first half of fifteenth century, and then starting again from the second half of eighteenth century. From the sixteenth to the first half of eighteenth centuries, anthropomorphic and zoomorphic motifs were depicted in a stylized form. The author of the study reveals the symbolism of the most common motifs, along with the typological and artistic features of the images. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the color, silhouette, and figurativeness of anthropomorphic and zoomorphic images in the Crimean Tatar decorative and applied art depend primarily on the material, technique, and functional purpose of the created object. In addition to images on objects, anthropomorphism is present as the silhouette of objects.

Keywords: Crimean Tatar decorative and applied art, ornamental art, motive, anthropomorphic, zoomorphic, symbolism, features of the image

For citation: Akchurina-Muftieva N.M. Anthropomorphism and Zoomorphism in the Ornamental Art of the Crimean Tatars. Zolotoordynskoe obozrenie=Golden Horde Review. 2022, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 229–240. DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2022-10-1.229-240

REFERENCES

  1. Veymarn B.V. Iskusstvo arabskikh stran i Irana [The Art of Arabic Countries and Iran]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1974. 276 p. (In Russian)
  2. Veymarn B., Kaptereva T., Podol’skiy A. Iskusstvo arabs’kikh narodov [The Art of Arab Peoples]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1960. 200 p. (In Russian)
  3. Chervonnaya S.M. Sovremennoe islamskoe iskusstvo narodov Rossii [Modern Islamic Art of the Peoples of Russia]. Moscow: Progress, 2008. 600 p. (In Russian)
  4. Bol’shakov O.G. Islam i izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo [Islam and visual art]. Trudy Gosudarstvennogo ermitazha [Proceedings of the State Hermitage]. 1969, Vol. Х, pp. 142–156. (In Russian)
  5. Barbaro I. Barbaro i Kontarini o Rossii: k istorii italo-russkikh svyazey v XV v. [Barbaro and Contarini about Russia: To the History of Italian-Russian Relations in the fifteenth century]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1971. 276 p. (In Russian)
  6. Ambroz L. K. O simvolike russkoy krest’yanskoy vyshivki arkhaicheskogo tipa [On the symbolism of Russian peasant embroidery of archaic type]. Sovetskaya arkhitektura [Soviet Architecture]. 1996, no. 3, pp. 34–41. (In Russian)
  7. Fabr A. Dostopamyatneyshie drevnosti Kryma [The Most Memorable Antiquities of Crimea]. Odessa, 1859. 98 p. (In Russian)
  8. Akchurina-Muftieva N.M., Vklad V.V. Kontrol’skoy v nasledie dekorativnogo iskusstva krymskikh tatar [The contribution of V.V. Kontrolskaia into the heritage of the decorative arts of the Crimean Tatars]. “Kul’tura narodov Prichernomor’ya s drevneyshikh vremen do nashikh dney”: materialy konferentsii: XLIV Mezhdunarodnykh nauchnykh chteniy [Culture of the Peoples of the Black Sea Region from Ancient Times to the Present Day: Conference Proceedings: XLIV International Scientific Readings]. Krymskiy federal’nyy universitet imeni V.I. Vernadskogo, 2018, pp. 7–10. (In Russian)
  9. Kuftin B.A. O material’noy kul’ture tatar. Yuzhnyy bereg. Polevaya 1924 г. [On the material culture of the Tatars. South coast. Field Notebook. 1924]. Arkhiv muzeya antropologii i etnografii [Archive of Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography]. 44 p. (In Russian)
  10. Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya [Myths of the Peoples of the World. Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Sovetskaya arkheologiya Sovetskaja entsiklopediya, 1980. 1147 p. (In Russian)
  11. Krymskotatarskaya simvolika: opyt slovarya [Crimean Tatar Symbols: Dictionary Experience]. Simferopol, 2002. 16 p. (In Russian)
  12. Ivanov Yu.V., Krasnovskaya N.A. Brak u narodov Tsentral’noy i Yugo-Vostochnoy Evropy [Marriage of the Peoples of Central and South-Eastern Europe]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. Available at: http://www.rulit.me/books/brak-u-narodov-centralnoj-i-yugo-vostochnoj-evropy-read-417898-1.html (In Russian)
  13. Kuznecov I.V. Odezhda armyan Ponta: Semiotika material’noy kul’tury [Pontus Armenian Clothing: Semiotics of Material Culture]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura, 1995. 296 p. (In Russian)
  14. Bernshtam A.N. Zhilishche krymskogo predgor’ya [Houses of Crimean foothills]. Izvestiya Gosudarstvennoy akademii istorii material’noy kul’tury [Bulletin of the State Academy of the History of Material Culture]. 1931. Vol. 9, iss. 6–7, pp. 1–46. (In Russian)
  15. Kurbanov G. Koran i izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo [The Quran and visual art]. Polovetskaya luna (Publitsisticheskiy i – literaturno- khudozhestvennyy zhurnal, Cherkessk [Polovtsian Moon (Publicistic and literary and art journal, Cherkessk)]. 1992, no. 1, pp. 106–110. (In Russian)
  16. Chepurina P.Ja. Tatarskaya vyshivka [Tatar embroidery]. Iskusstvo [The Art]. 1935, no. 2, pp. 103–108. (In Russian)
  17. Spasskaya E. Yu. Tatarskie vyshivki Staro-Krymskogo rayona (po materialam A.M. Petrovoy). Ottisk iz “Izvestiya Azerbaydzhanskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta im. V.I. Lenina” [Tatar embroideries of the Staryj Krym region. An imprint from “Izvestia of the Azerbaijan State University named after V.I. Lenin”]. Vostokovedenie [Oriental Studies]. Baku, 1926. Vol. 1. (In Russian)
  18. Kotov V.G. Zhenskoe bozhestvo Umay/Khumay: sravnitel’naya kharakteristika [Female deity Umai/Humai: Comparative characteristic]. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudar­stvennogo universiteta. Istoriya [Bulletin of the Altai State University. History]. 2010, no. 4–2 (68), pp. 111–114. (In Russian)
  19. Cheremisin D.V. K izucheniyu irano-tyurkskikh svyazey v sfere mifologii [Towards Iranian-Turkic ties in the field of mythology. Goddess Umai and the mythical bird]. Narody Sibiri. Istorija i kul’tura [The Peoples of Siberia. History and Culture]. Novosibirsk, 1997, pp. 31–43. (In Russian)
  20. Skobelev S.G. Umay i Dzerasa – bogini-sestry [Umai and Dzerasa – Sister Goddesses]. Jelektronnyj zhurnal “Sibirskaja Zaimka”. Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet [Electronic Journal “Sibirskaya Zaimka”. Novosibirsk State University]. Avai­lable at: https://zaimka.ru/skobelev-umaj-dzerassa (accessed: 28.2.2022). (In Russian)
  21. Akchurіna-Muftiєva N.M., Suchasne doslіdzhennya grupi tkanin z kolektsії Bakhchisa-rays’kogo zapovіdnika [Modern study of a group of fabrics from the collection of Bakhchisaray Reserve]. Narodoznavchі zoshiti [Ethnographic Notebooks]. 2019, no. 1 (145), pp. 179–184. DOI: 10.15407/nz2019.01.179 (In Ukrainian)
  22. Akchurina-Muftieva N.M. Kamennaja plastika musul’manskih memorial’nyh pamjatnikov Kryma XIII–XIX vekov [Stone plastic of the Muslim memorial monuments of the Crimea from the thirteenth to nineteenth centuries]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Akademii nauk Chechenskoy Respubliki i Kompleksnogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta imeni Kh.I. Ibragimova Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Collection of Scientific Papers of the Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic and the Complex Research Institute Named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2018, no. 7, pp. 300–316. (In Russian)
  23. Akchokrakly O. Tatarskie tamgi v Krymu [Tatar tamgas in Crimea]. Materialya nauchno-etnograficheskoy ekspeditsii po izucheniyu krymskotatarskoy kul’tury v Krymu 1925g. [Proceedings of the Scientific Ethnographic Expedition on Studying the Crimean Tatar Culture in Crimea in 1925.]. Simferopol, 1927, pp. 32–47. (In Russian)
  24. Chervonnaya S.M. Musul’manskaya epigrafika (reznye nadgrobne kamni) v Krymu. K voprosu ob estetike sunitskogo Islama v iskusstve krymskikh tatar [Muslim Epigraphy (Carved Headstones) in Crimea. To the Issue of Aesthetics of Sunni Islam in the Art of the Crimean Tatars]. Moscow, 1997. 38 p. (In Russian).

About the author: Nuria M. Akchurina-Muftieva – Dr. hab. of Arts, Professor of the Department of Decorative Arts, Crimean Engineering Pedagogical University named after Fevzi Yakubov (8, Uchebnyy lane, Simferopol 295015, Russian Federation). E-mail: akchurina_05@mail.ru

Received  December 1, 2021   Accepted for publication  February 28, 2022
Published Online March 29, 2022