2019, vol. 7, no. 1. Chernyshov S.A.

2019, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 159-174

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2019-7-1.159-174

   IVAN THE TERRIBLE – CHINGGIS KHAN’S OR AUGUSTUS’S DESCENDANT:
LEGITIMIZATION OF THE SUPREME AUTHORITY OF THE MOSCOW TSARDOM
IN COMMUNICATION PRACTICES OF THE 15TH–16TH CENTURIES

S.A. Chernyshov
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
1502911@mail.ru

Abstract: Research objective: To consider the communication practices of Ivan the Terrible, his predecessors, Russian diplomats and other representatives of the supreme power of the Moscow tsardom in the 15th–16th centuries in the context of the legitimization of rights to certain territories and ideas about historical continuity in general
Research materials: The study was conducted on the basis of the analysis of the chronicles, charter and diplomatic materials, along with historical and ethnographic studies.
Results and novelty of the research: The article “Historical Examples in the Letters of Ivan IV to the Crimean Khanate and the Nogai Horde” (“Golden Horde Review”, 2018, no. 2) published by M.V. Moiseev, opens up broad opportunities for discussion about the positioning of the legitimacy of the supreme Moscow authorities in the period under consideration. The importance of this article is extremely difficult to overestimate since the scrupulous embedding of images and narratives of certain events in official documents is still rarely a separate research task. At the same time, having touched upon an important topic for Russian historiography, M.S. Moiseev leads the discussion in the direction of comparing the versions set forth in diplomatic or other official documents with the historical reality reconstructed with the use of other material. It is obvious that such a comparison would inevitably lead to the conclusion that the versions of events found in official documents are inconsistent – something which does, in fact, happen. More productive is the comparison of communication practices that the supreme Moscow authorities were developing with western, eastern and (no less important) intra-elite counterparties. The mention of that last group, in particular, makes it possible to take a fresh look at the thesis on the elite consensus on those or other versions of the annexation of the Volga region and the legitimization of the Moscow tsar. On the materials of diplomatic correspondence, chronicles, literary monuments and studies of historians, it is concluded that the positioning of the supreme Russian government differed significantly depending on the addressee’s relative position: in the west, east or inside the country. Starting to build a harmonious official version of the legitimization of the power of the Moscow tsar quite late, court intellectuals and Ivan the Terrible himself formulated at least three different full-fledged versions of the origins of the power of Moscow tsars from which they justified their right to occupy an important place among the Western and Eastern rulers: Augustus, Chinggis Khan and Christ.

Keywords: diplomatic correspondence of Ivan the Terrible, Tatar states, European states, state policy, legitimization of the supreme power

For citation: Chernyshov S.A. Ivan the Terrible – Chinggis Khan’s or Augustus’s Descendant: Legitimization of the Supreme Authority of the Moscow Tsardom in Communication Practices of the 15th–16th centuries. Zolotoordynskoe obozrenie=Golden Horde Review. 2019, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 159–174. DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2019-7-1.159-174

REFERENCES

  1. Akishin M.O. D’yaki Posol’skogo prikaza i prisoyedineniye Sibiri [Scribes of the Ambassadorial Order and the accession of Siberia]. Rossiyskaya istoriya [Russian History]. 2015, no. 3, pp. 45–57. (In Russian)
  2. Biblioteka literatury Drevney Rusi [Library of literature of ancient Russia]. Pod red. D.S. Likhacheva, L.A. Dmitriyeva, A.A. Alekseyeva, N.V. Ponyrko. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2003. Vol. 12: XVI vek. 683 p. (In Russian)
  3. Biblioteka literatury Drevney Rusi [Library of literature of ancient Russia]. Pod red. D.S. Likhacheva, L.A. Dmitriyeva, A.A. Alekseyeva, N.V. Ponyrko. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2001. Vol. 11: XVI vek. 683 p. (In Russian)
  4. Bychkova M.Ye. Regalii vlasti moskovskikh gosudarey i formirovaniye idei gosudarstvennoy vlasti [Regalia of power of Moscow sovereigns and the formation of the idea of state power]. Sud’ba dvukh imperiy. Rossiyskaya i Avstro-Vengerskaya monarkhii ot rastsveta do krusheniya [The fate of two empires. Russian and Austro-Hungarian monarchies from bloom to wreck]. Moscow, Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2006, pp. 128–148. 683 p. (In Russian)
  5. Vernadskiy G.V. Istoriya Rossii. Moskovskoye tsarstvo [The History of Russia. The Moscow Tsardom]. Moscow–Tver, Lean, Agraf, 1997. 511 p. (In Russian)
  6. Vernadskiy G.V. Russkaya istoriya [The Russian History]. Moscow, Agraf, 1997. 542 p. (In Russian)
  7. Vianey B. Puteshestviye Zhana Sovazha v Moskoviyu v 1586 godu. Otkrytiye Arktiki frantsuzami v XVI veke [Journey of Jean Sauvage to Muscovy in 1586. Discovery of the Arctic by the French in the 16th century]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2017. 512 p. (In Russian)
  8. Gorskiy A.A. Moskva i Orda [Moscow and the Horde]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2000. 214 p. (In Russian)
  9. Jerome Horsey. Zapiski o Rossii. XVI – nachalo XVII vv. [Notes about Russia. 16th – early 17th century]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1990. 288 p. (In Russian)
  10. Yerusalimskiy K.YU. Predstavleniya Andreya Mikhaylovicha Kurbskogo o knyazheskoy vlasti i russkikh knyazey IX–XVI veka [Perception of Andrei Mikhailovich Kurbsky of the princely power and the Russian princes of the 9th and 16th centuries]. Sotsium. Al’manakh sotsial’noï istorii [Socium. Almanac of social history]. Kyiv, 2004. Is. 4, pp. 71–100. (In Ukrainian)
  11. Zhernovkov G.I. Na zare Sibirskoy istorii [At the dawn of Siberian history]. Novonikolayevsk, 1919. 36 p. (In Russian)
  12. Iskhakov D.M. Sibirskiy yurt v kontse XV veka – nachale 1560-kh gg.: khanstvo ili knyazhestvo? [The Siberian Yurt at the end of the 15th century – the beginning of the 1560s: The Khanate or principality?] Srednevekovyye tyurko-tatarskiye gosudarstva [Medieval Turko-Tatar States]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 43–47. (In Russian)
  13. Krom M.M. Rozhdeniye gosudarstva: Moskovskaya Rus’ XV–XVI vekov [The birth of the state: The Moscow’s Rus’ of 15th–16th centuries]. Moscow, Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2018. 256 p. (In Russian)
  14. Likhachev D.S. Chelovek v literature Drevney Rusi [The man in the literature of ancient Rus’]. 3-ye izdaniye. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006. 202 p. (In Russian)
  15. Lushnikov O.V. Vliyaniye ordynskogo faktora na stanovleniye Moskovskogo gosudarstva: istoriograficheskiy aspekt [The influence of the Horde factor on the formation of the Muscovite state: the historiographic aspect]. Srednevekovyye tyurko-tatarskiye gosudarstva [Medieval Turko-Tatar States]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 84–91. (In Russian)
  16. Maslyuzhenko D.N. Sibirskaya knyazheskaya dinastiya Taybugidov: istoki formirovaniya i mifologizatsii genealogii [The Siberian princely dynasty of the Taybugids: the origins of the formation and mythologization of genealogy]. Srednevekovyye tyurko–tatarskiye gosudarstva [Medieval Turko-Tatar States]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 9–21. (In Russian)
  17. Moiseyev M.V. Istoricheskiye primery v poslaniyakh Ivana IV v Krymskoye khanstvo i Nogayskuyu Ordu [Historical Examples in the Letters of Ivan IV to the Crimean Khanate and the Nogai Horde]. Zolotoordynskoe obozrenie=Golden Horde Review. 2018. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 283–303. DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2019-7-1.283-303 (In Russian)
  18. Mut’ya N.N. Ivan Groznyy: istorizm i lichnost’ pravitelya v otechestvennom iskusstve XIX–XX vv. [Ivan the Terrible: historicism and the personality of the ruler in the domestic art of the 19th and 20th centuries]. St. Petersburg, Aleteyya, 2010. 496 p. (In Russian)
  19. Payps R. Rossiya pri starom rezhime [Russia under the old regime]. Moscow, 1993. 424 p. (In Russian)
  20. Parfent’yev N.P., Parfent’yeva N.V. Obraz vysshey vlasti Moskovii v muzykal’no – gimnograficheskom tvorchestve tsarya Ivana IV Groznogo [The image of the highest authority of Muscovy in the musical and hymnographic works of Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of history]. 2017, no. 8, pp. 164–168. (In Russian)
  21. Plyukhanova M.B. Syuzhety i simvoly Moskovskogo tsarstva [Plots and symbols of the Moscow tsardom]. St. Petersburg, Akropol, 1995. 336 p.
  22. Polnoye sobraniye russkikh letopisey [Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles]: v 43 t.; otv. red. M.N. Tikhomirov. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1965. Vol. 29. Letopisets nachala tsarstva Tsarya i Velikogo knyazya Ivana Vasil’yevicha. Aleksandro-Nevskaya letopis’. Lebedevskaya letopis’. 390 p. (In Russian)
  23. Polnoye sobraniye russkikh letopisey [Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles]: v 43 vol.; pod red. S.L. Ptashitskogo, A.A. Shakhmatova. St. Petersburg, Tipografiya M.A. Aleksandrova, 1907. Vol. 17. Zapadnorusskiye letopisi. 384 p. (In Russian)
  24. Rogozhin N.M. Posol’skiye knigi Rossii kontsa XV-nachala XVII vv. [The Ambassadorial books of Russia of the late 15th – early 17th centuries]. Moscow, Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1994. 210 p. (In Russian)
  25. Rossiya XVI veka. Vospominaniya inostrantsev [Russia of the 16th century. Memories of foreigners]. Smolensk, Rusis, 2003. 403 p. (In Russian)
  26. Sbornik Imperatorskogo Russkogo Istoricheskogo Obshchestva. V 148 t. Vol. 129: Pamyatniki diplomaticheskikh snosheniy drevney Rossii s derzhavami inostrannymi: Pamyatniki diplomaticheskikh snosheniy Moskovskogo gosudarstva so Shvedskim gosudarstvom [Collection of the Imperial Russian Historical Society. Monuments of Diplomatic Relations of Ancient Russia with Foreign Powers: Monuments of Diplomatic Relations of the Moscow State with the Swedish State]. Part 1: 1556–1586 gg. St. Petersburg, 1910. 585 p. (In Russian)
  27. Sbornik Imperatorskogo Russkogo Istoricheskogo Obshchestva. V 148 t. Vol. 137: Pamyatniki diplomaticheskikh snosheniy Moskovskogo gosudarstva s Pol’sko-Litovskim gosudarstvom [Collection of the Imperial Russian Historical Society. In 148 volumes. Volume 137: Monuments of diplomatic relations of the Moscow State with the Polish-Lithuanian State]. Moscow, 1912. 808 p. (In Russian)
  28. Sbornik Imperatorskogo Russkogo Istoricheskogo Obshchestva. V 148 t. Vol. 38: Pamyatniki diplomaticheskikh snosheniy Moskovskogo gosudarstva s Angliyey. Ch. 1: 1581–1604 gg. [Collection of the Imperial Russian Historical Society. In 148 volumes. Volume 38: Monuments of diplomatic relations of the Moscow State with England. Part 1: 1581–1604]. St. Petersburg, 1883. 493 p. (In Russian)
  29. Trepavlov V.V. «Belyy tsar’». Obraz monarkha i predstavleniya o poddanstve u narodov Rossii XV–XVIII vv. [The “White Tsar”. The image of the monarch and the idea of citizenship among the peoples of Russia of the 15th–18th centuries]. St. Petersburg, Olega Obyshko Publ., 2017. 320 p.
  30. Trepavlov V.V. Istoriya i istoricheskoye vremya v predstavleniyakh pozdne­srednevekovykh kochevnikov Yevrazii [History and historical time in the views of the late medieval nomads of Eurasia]. Drevneyshiye gosudarstva Vostochnoy Yevropy: 2001 god: istoricheskaya pamyat’ i formy yeye voploshcheniya [The most ancient states of Eastern Europe: 2001: historical memory and forms of its embodiment]. Moscow, Vostochnaya literatura Publ., 2003, pp. 191–203. (In Russian)
  31. Filyushkin A.I. «Predtecha pakta Molotova-Ribbentropa» (1576 g.). [The “Forerunner of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact” (1576)]. Dve imperii – mnogo natsional’nostey. Materialy vengersko-rossiyskogo nauchnogo seminara (25 iyunya 2007 g., Sankt-Peterburg) [Two empires – many nationalities. Proceedings of the Hungarian-Russian research seminar (June 25, 2007, St. Petersburg)]. Budapesht, 2007, pp. 26–44. (In Russian)
  32. Filyushkin A.I. Ocherk istorii rossiyskogo gosudarstva v XVI veke [An essay on the history of the Russian state in the 16th century]. Novoye v istoricheskoy nauke: v pomoshch’ prepodavatelyu istorii [New in historical research: to help the teacher of history]. Nizhnevartovsk, 1997, pp. 28–44. (In Russian)
  33. Filyushkin A.I. Ponyatiye «tsarstvo» v Srednevekovoy Rusi [The concept of “tsardom” in Medieval Rus’]. Voronezhskaya beseda na 1999–2000 gody [The Voronezh conversation for 1999–2000]. Voronezh, 1999, pp. 161–177. (In Russian)
  34. Fletcher J. O gosudarstve russkom, ili obraz pravleniya russkogo tsarya (obyknovenno nazyvayemogo tsarem moskovskim), s opisaniyem nravov i obychayev zhiteley etoy strany [About the Russian State, or the type of government of the Russian tsar (usually called the Moscow tsar), describing the manners and customs of the inhabitants of this country]. Rossiya XVI veka. Vospominaniya inostrantsev [Russia of the 16th century. Memories of foreigners]. Smolensk, Rusis, 2003, pp. 14–151. (In Russian)
  35. Sherstova L.I. Russkiye i aborigeny yuzhnoy Sibiri: yevraziyskaya osnova etnokul’turnykh kontaktov [Russians and aborigines of southern Siberia: Eurasian basis of ethnocultural contacts]. Sibirskiy plavil’nyy kotol: sotsial’no-demograficheskiye protsessy v Severnoy Azii XVI – nachala XVII veka [The Siberian melting pot: socio-demographic processes in Northern Asia of the 16th – early 20th century]. Novosibirsk, Sibirskiy Khronograf, 2004, pp. 61–70. (In Russian)
  36. Sherstova L.I. Tyurki i russkiye v Yuzhnoy Sibiri: etnopoliticheskiye protsessy i etnokul’turnaya dinamika XVII – nachala XX veka [Turks and Russians in Southern Siberia: ethnopolitical processes and ethnocultural dynamics of the 17th – early 20th century]. Novosibirsk, 2005. 311 p. (In Russian)
  37. Shmidt S.O. Zametki o yazyke poslaniy Ivana Groznogo [Notes on the language of the messages of Ivan the Terrible]. Trudy otdela drevnerusskoy literatury [Works of the Old Russian Literature Department]. Vol. 14. Moscow–Leningrad, Akademiya nauk SSSR Publ., 1958, pp. 256–265. (In Russian)

About the author: Sergey A. Chernyshov – Cand. Sci. (History), Senior Lecturer, Novosibirsk State Technical University (20, Karl Marx Ave., Novosibirsk 630073, Russian Federation). E-mail: 1502911@mail.ru

Received  December 19, 2018  Accepted for publication  February 26, 2019
Published online  March 29, 2019