2023, vol. 11, no. 3. Moiseev M.V.

2023, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 681-692

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2023-11-3.681-692

EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SQPYEI

   ON THE ORGANIZATION OF THE DIPLOMATIC SERVICE
IN THE POST-HORDE CHINGISID STATES IN THE 16TH CENTURY
(CRIMEAN AND KAZAN KHANATES): “TETS” AND “BAKSHIS”

M.V. Moiseev
Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, Russian Federation
maksi-moisee@yandex.ru

Abstract: Research objectives: This study investigates the development of the embassy service in the post-Horde states, with a specific focus on identifying its structure and analyzing its personnel composition.
Research materials: The research primarily relies on the analysis of Russian embassy books and chronicles.
Results and novelty of the research: The examination of Russian documents reveals that Khan’s embassies followed a three-part structure: Ambassador (elchi)-deputy (tet)-secretary (bakshi). The Russian chancellery was notably reluctant to use the term “tet,” likely because individuals with this title were responsible for collecting specific duties from Russian lands in favor of the Khan. It is possible that the Russian documents referred to the “tet” as a toll collector; in any case, we know that ambassadors could be accompanied by “toll collectors.” After 1475, these duties were abolished. In total, 7 mentions of Crimean tets and 6 Kazan tets were identified. References to baksheys in embassies are better preserved, with a total of 18 Crimean, 8 Kazan, 2 Nogai, and 1 Siberian bakshi identified. One of the primary responsibilities of baksheys was to compile a certificate. Thus, the observation of the embassy mission’s composition relies on source-based evidence. Even when there is no specific information about shoring, the mere presence of a bakshey serves as a reliable indicator that the outcome of the negotiations was expected to involve shoring. The study reveals that we can discuss the process of forming the diplomatic service in the post-Horde Chingisid states.

Keywords: diplomatic service, ambassador, elchi, tet, bakshey, embassy books

For citation: Moiseev  M.V. On the organization of the diplomatic service in the post-Horde Chingisid states in the 16th century (Crimean and Kazan khanates): “tets” and “bakshis”. Zolotoordynskoe obozrenie=Golden Horde Review. 2023, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 681–692. DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2023-11-3.681-692 (In Russian)

REFERENCES

  1. Belyakov A.V. Baksheys: Evolution of the Concept. Vostok (Oriens). 2021, no. 4, pp. 60–71. (In Russian)
  2. Vinogradov A.V. The Sulesh family in the foreign policy of the Crimean Khanate of the second half of the 16th century. Turkological collection. 2005: The Turkic peoples of Russia and the Great Steppe. Moscow: Oriental Literature, 2006. P. 26–73. (In Russian)
  3. Vinogradov A.V. Political elite of the Crimean Khanate in 1560–1590s. Vostok (Oriens). 2016, no. 5, pp. 25–41. (In Russian)
  4. Halperin Ch. The Ideology of Silence: Prejudice and Pragmatism on the Medieval Russian Religious Frontier. American Russian studies. Milestones of historiography in recent years. Period of Kiev and Moscow Rus’. Anthology. Samara, 2001, pp. 65–97. (In Russian)
  5. Halperin Ch. The Tatar Yoke: the Image of the Mongols in Medieval Russia. Voronezh, 2012. 230 p. (In Russian)
  6. Torkunov A.V. (ed.) Diplomatic Service: Textbook. Moscow: Rosspen, 2002. 686 p. (In Russian)
  7. Zaitsev I.V. Who is “tet”? Golden Horde civilization. Iss. 4. Kazan, 2011. P. 29–34. (In Russian)
  8. Zaitsev I.V. Where did the Crimean ambassadors stay in Moscow and the Moscow ambassadors at the court of the Crimean Khan in the 16th century? Crimean Historical Review. 2016, no. 2, pp. 35–51. (In Russian)
  9. Maslova S.A. Horde ambassadors in Russia. Ancient Russia. Questions of Medieval Studies. 2015, no. 3(61), pp. 82–83 (In Russian)
  10. Maslova S. A. Institutions of the Horde power over Russia (baskaks, darugs, ambassadors). Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Historical Sciences. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ., 2015. 154 p. (In Russian)
  11. Novoselsky A.A. The struggle of the Moscow state with the Tatars in the first half of the 17th century. Moscow-Leningrad: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1948. 452 p. (In Russian)
  12. The Book of Embassies on the Relations between Russia and the Nogai Horde. 1489–1549. Makhachkala, 1995. (In Russian)
  13. The Book of Embassies on the Relations between the Muscovite State and Crimea, 1567–1572. Otv. redaktor M.V. Moiseev; podg. teksta A.V. Malov, O.S. Smirnova; stat’i, komment. A.V. Vinogradov, I.V. Zaytsev, A.V. Malov, M.V. Moiseev. Moscow, 2016. (In Russian)
  14. Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles. Moscow, 2000. Vol. 13. (In Russian)
  15. Collections of the Russian Imperial Historical Society. Vol. 41. St. Petersburg: Printing house of F. Eleonsky and Co., 1884. 638 p. (In Russian)
  16. Collections of the Russian Imperial Historical Society. Vol. 95. St. Petersburg: S.P. Yakovlev Partnership, 1895.788 p. (In Russian)
  17. Seleznev Yu.V. Russian princes as part of the ruling elite of Juchiev ulus in the 13th–15th centuries. Voronezh: Central Chernozem Book Publishing House, 2013. 472 p. (In Russian)
  18. Seleznev Yu.V. Payments by Russian princes “for all Tatar protory”. Shagi / Steps. 2022, 8(3), pp. 168–185. (In Russian)
  19. Schmidt S.O. On the characteristics of Russian-Crimean relations of the second quarter of the 16th century. International relations of Russia to the 17th century. Moscow: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1961. P. 266–375. (In Russian)

About the author: Maksim V. Moiseev – Cand. Sci. (History), Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences (19, Dm. Ulyanov Str., Moscow 117292, Russian Federation); ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0421-8982, ResearcherID: E-1622-2016. E-mail: maksimoisee@yandex.ru

Received  June 21, 2023   Accepted for publication  August 22, 2023
Published  Online September 29, 2023