2022, vol. 10, no. 4. Shaymuratova D.N., Askeyev I.V., Nedashkovsky L.F.

2022, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 851-867

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2022-10-4.851-867
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PBJMIN

   THE IMPORTANCE OF BIRDS IN THE GOLDEN HORDE
RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF THE LOWER VOLGA REGION
(BY THE EXAMPLE OF THE BAGAEVKA SETTLEMENT)

D.N. Shaymuratova 1, I.V. Askeyev 2, L.F. Nedashkovsky 3
1, 2 Institute of Problems in Ecology and Mineral Wealth
of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences
Kazan, Russian Federation
1 galimovad@gmail.com ,  2 archaeozoologist@yandex.ru
3 Kazan Federal University
Kazan, Russian Federation
Leonard.Nedashkovsky@kpfu.ru

Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this work is a comprehensive analysis of bird remains from the archaeozoological collection of the Bagaevka settlement, including species, quantitative data, size-age composition, and an interpretation of the results obtained taking into account archaeological data. The importance of birds is considered, using the example of rural settlements of the Uvek site region and the Golden Horde city Ukek itself.
Research materials: The article presents a study of the bird remains from the Bagaevka settlement (trench I) – a large settlement of a region centered on the Golden Horde city Ukek from the second half of the 13th century through the 14th century. As a comparison of the consumption and importance of birds in the life of the people of the city and rural settlement of the Golden Horde period of the Saratov Volga region, we present the results of a study of a collection of bird remains from the excavations of the Uvek site.
Results and novelty of the research: This study is the first comprehensive analysis of bird remains and their interpretation for this area in the Golden Horde period. In the archaeozoological collection of the Bagaevka settlement, 24 species have been identified: 3 species of domestic birds and 21 species of wild birds. In a quantitative ratio, bones of domestic chickens prevail – 70.1% of all found bird bones. Among the remains of wild species, the largest number of bones belonged to the black grouse. Interesting are the finds of the remains of birds of prey, Accipitriformes, and the presence of remains from synanthropic species. The study of the collections revealed a high diversity of bird species and the versatility of their use: food; breeding of domestic species for meat and eggs; hunting with birds of prey; and the use of some species of wild birds (owls) as sacred animals.

Keywords: bird remains, comprehensive study, the Golden Horde, the Lower Volga region, rural settlements

For citation: Shaymuratova D.N., Askeyev I.V., Nedashkovsky L.F. The importance of birds in the Golden Horde rural settlements of the Lower Volga region (by the example of the Bagaevka settlement). Zolotoordynskoe obozrenie=Golden Horde Review. 2022, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 851–867.  DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2022-10-4.851-867 (In Russian)

Acknowledgments: The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-09-00004.

REFERENCES

  1. Aksakov S.T. Okhota s yastrebom za perepelkami [Hunting with a hawk for quail]. Aksakov S.T. Sobranie sochineniy [Aksakov S.T. Collected works]. Moscow: Goslitizdat, 1956, vol. IV, pp. 480–503. (In Russian)
  2. Askeyev I.V., Galimova D.N., Askeyev O.V. Ptitsy Srednego Povolzh’ya v V–XVIII vv. n.e. (po materialam arkheologicheskikh raskopok) [Birds of the Middle Volga region in the V–XVIII centuries A.D. (based on materials of archaeological excavations)]. Povolzhskaya arkheologiya [Volga region arcaeology]. 2013, no. 3(5), pp. 116–144. (In Russian)
  3. Zhitkov B.M., Buturlin S.A. Materialy dlya ornitofauny Simbirskoy gubernii [Materials for the ornithofauna of the Simbirsk province]. Zapiski Imperatorskogo Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva po obshchey geografii [Notes of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society on general geography]. 1906, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 251–252. (In Russian)
  4. Kubankin D.A. Arkheologicheskie issledovaniya na Uvekskom gorodishche v 2014–2017 gg. Osnovnye itogi i perspektivy [Archaeological research at the Uvek site in 2014–2017. The main results and prospects]. Arkheologiya evraziyskikh stepey [Archaeology of Eurasian steppes]. 2018, no. 5, pp. 48–53. (In Russian)
  5. Kurochkin E.N. Metody izucheniya iskopaemykh ptits [Methods of studying fossil birds]. Chastnye metody izucheniya istorii sovremennykh ekosistem [Individual methods of studying the history of modern ecosystems]. Moscow: Nauka, 1979, pp. 152–163. (In Russian)
  6. Mullagulov M.G. Sokolinaya okhota u bashkir [Hawk hunt of the Bashkirs]. Ufa: GUP RB UPK, 2013, 160 p.(In Russian)
  7. Nedashkovsky L.F. Zolotoordynskie goroda Nizhnego Povolzh’ya i ikh okruga [The Golden Horde cities of the Low Volga region and their periphery]. Moscow: Izdatel’skaya firma ‘Vostochnaya literatura’ RAN, 2010, 351 p. (In Russian)
  8. Nedashkovsky L.F. Issledovaniya Khmelevskogo I selishcha [Researches of the Hmelevskoe I settlement]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki [Academic transactions of Kazan University. Humanities series]. 2011, vol. 153, book 3, pp. 39–50. (In Russian)
  9. Nedashkovsky L.F. Issledovaniya Bagaevskogo selishcha [Researches of the Bagaevka settlement]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki [Academic transactions of Kazan University. Humanities series]. 2013, vol. 155, book 3, part 1, pp. 7–19. (In Russian)
  10. Rudenko S.I. Bashkiry. Istoriko-etnograficheskie ocherki [Bashkirs. Historical and ethnographic essays]. Ufa: Kitap, 2006, 376 p. (In Russian)
  11. Sushkin P.P. Ptitsy sredney Kirgizskoy stepi (Turgayskaya oblast’ i chast’ Ural’skoy) [Birds of the middle Kyrgyz steppe (Turgai region and part of the Ural)]. Materialy k poznaniyu fauny i flory Rossiyskoy imperii. Otdel zoologicheskiy [Materials for the study of the fauna and flora of the Russian Empire. Zoological section]. 1908, iss. 8, pp. 1–803, I–VIII. (In Russian)
  12. Shaymuratova D.N. Osobennosti izucheniya subfossil’nykh ostatkov ryb i ptits iz arkheologicheskikh pamyatnikov Srednego Povolzh’ya i ikh ekologicheskaya interpre­tatsiya [Features of studying subfossil remains of fishes and birds from archaeological sites of the Middle Volga region and their ecological interpretation]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal prikladnoy ekologii [Russian Journal of Applied Ecology]. 2016, no. 1, pp. 8–13. (In Russian)
  13. Yavorskaya L.V., Nedashkovsky L.F. Arkheozoologicheskie materialy Bagaev­skogo selishcha [Archaeozoological remains from the Bagaevka settlement]. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology]. 2020, iss. 261, pp. 393–402. (In Russian)
  14. Baron H. From Arthrosis to Necrosis: Many, Many Pathological Chickens from the Avar Cemetery at Vienna Csokorgasse, Austria. Care or Neglect? Evidence of Animal Disease in Archaeology / Proceedings of the 6th meeting of the Animal Palaeopathology Working Group of the International Council for Archaeozoology (ICAZ), Budapest, Hungary, 2016. Edited by László Bartosiewicz and Erika Gál. Oxford & Philadelphia: Oxbow Books, 2018, pp. 208–229.
  15. Boyle J.A. The Owl and the Hare in the Popular Beliefs of the Medieval Mongols. Central Asiatic Journal, 1979, vol. 23, no. 1/2, pp. 65–71.
  16. Driesch A. A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1976, vol. 1, 148 p.
  17. Falck J.P. Beiträge zur topographischen Kenntniß des russischen Reichs. St. Petersburg: Kayserl. Academie der Wissenschaften, 1785, bd. 3, 584 p., XXXV p.
  18. Gal E. The Role of Archaeo-Ornithology in Environmental and Animal History Studies. Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Preservation Within the Light of New Technologies. Selected Papers from the Joint Archaeolingua-EPOCH workshop, 27 September – 2 October 2004, Százhalombatta, Hungary. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 2006, pp. 49–61.
  19. Gal E. Bone Evidence of Pathological Lesions in Domestic Hen (Gallus domesticus Linnaeus, 1758). Veterinarija ir Zootechnika, 2008, 41/63, pp. 42–48.
  20. Gal E. Broken-Winged: Fossil and Sub-Fossil Pathological Bird Bones From Recent Excavations. Current Research in Animal Palaeopathology. Proceedings of the Second ICAZ Animal Palaeopathology Working Group Conference. British Archaeological Reports International Series S1844. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2008, pp. 80–86.
  21. Galimova D.N., Askeyev I.V., Askeyev O.V. Bird Remains from 5th – 17th Cen­tury AD Archaeological Sites in the Middle Volga Region of Russia. International Journal Osteoarchaeology. 2014, Special Issue, pp. 347–357.
  22. Nedashkovskii L.F. Economy of the Golden Horde population. Anthropology & Archaeology of Eurasia. 2009, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 35–50.
  23. Nedashkovsky L.F. Agriculture, Cattle Breeding and Trade in the Golden Horde Based on Data from Written Sources. Terra Sebus: Acta Musei Sabesiensis. 2014, Special Issue. Russian Studies. From the early Middle Ages to the present day, pp. 291–303.
  24. Pallas P.S. Zoographia Rosso-Asiatica: sistens omnium animalium in extenso Imperio Rossico, et adjacentibus maribus observatorum recensionem, domicilia, mores et descriptiones, anatomen atque icones plurimorum. Petropoli: Academia scientarum, 1811, t. 1, 568 p.
  25. Prummel W. Evidence of hawking (Falconry) from bird and mammal bones. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 1997, vol. 7, iss. 4, pp. 333–338.
  26. Serjeantson D. Birds. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 512 р.
  27. Shaymuratova (Galimova) D.N., Askeyev I.V., Askeyev O.V. The Studies of Archaeological Bird Remains from Medieval Staraya Ladoga. New Results and Interpretations. Monographs of the Archaeological Society of Finland 7 (MASF 7), Helsinki Harvest: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on the Application of Scientific Methods in Archaeology. Helsinki: Suomen arkeologinen seura, 2019, pp. 93–114.
  28. Van Neer W., Noyen K., De Cupere B., Beuls I. On the use of endosteal layers and medullary bone from domestic fowl in archaeozoological studies. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2002, vol. 29, iss. 2, p. 123–134.

About the authors: Dilyara N. Shaymuratova – Researcher of the laboratory of biomonitoring, Institute of Problems in Ecology and Mineral Wealth of the Tatarstan Aca­demy of Sciences (28, Daurskaya Str., Kazan 420087, Russian Federation). E-mail: galimovad@gmail.com

Igor V. Askeyev – Cand. Sci. (Biology), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher of the laboratory of biomonitoring, Institute of Problems in Ecology and Mineral Wealth of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences (28, Daurskaya Str., Kazan 420087, Russian Federation). E-mail: archaeozoologist@yandex.ru

Leonard F. Nedashkovsky – Dr. Sci. (History), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Archaeology and General History of the Institute of International Relations, Kazan Federal University (18, Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan 420008, Russian Federation). E-mail: Leonard.Nedashkovsky@kpfu.ru

Received  June 6, 2022  Accepted for publication  October 18, 2022
Published   Online December 29, 2022